<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac Developer Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://outofcheese.org/2003/12/07/mac-developer-journal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://outofcheese.org/2003/12/07/mac-developer-journal/</link>
	<description>Redo from start....</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://outofcheese.org/2003/12/07/mac-developer-journal/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2003 06:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outofcheese.org/?p=558#comment-343</guid>
		<description>How odd. Hopefully no one will confuse it with the other MDJ Mac journal, &lt;a href="http://www.macjournals.com/mdj/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.macjournals.com/mdj/&lt;/a&gt; . That MDJ is a very well written pay journal, but I haven't read it in a couple years.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How odd. Hopefully no one will confuse it with the other MDJ Mac journal, <a href="http://www.macjournals.com/mdj/" rel="nofollow">http://www.macjournals.com/mdj/</a> . That MDJ is a very well written pay journal, but I haven&#8217;t read it in a couple years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous &#38; Coward</title>
		<link>http://outofcheese.org/2003/12/07/mac-developer-journal/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous &#38; Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2003 08:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outofcheese.org/?p=558#comment-342</guid>
		<description>What we need more is the return of Develop.

MDJ suffers from the same problems MacTech has:
- It's empty.
- The topics are either too specific or too centered on newbies.
- The article on XCode reminds me of the marketing bullshit I read on the ADC WebSite about XCode and Luxology (where there's a huge lie on the time they put their hand on XCode (Cf WWDC keynote)).  (Rant of the day)

IMHO, the Zinio reader is fine. It's way easier to read than a PDF with vertical scrolling. And the 3D animation are not too boring (contrary to the optional vertical scroll mode in OS X) (Second rant of the day).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we need more is the return of Develop.</p>
<p>MDJ suffers from the same problems MacTech has:<br />
- It&#8217;s empty.<br />
- The topics are either too specific or too centered on newbies.<br />
- The article on XCode reminds me of the marketing bullshit I read on the ADC WebSite about XCode and Luxology (where there&#8217;s a huge lie on the time they put their hand on XCode (Cf WWDC keynote)).  (Rant of the day)</p>
<p>IMHO, the Zinio reader is fine. It&#8217;s way easier to read than a PDF with vertical scrolling. And the 3D animation are not too boring (contrary to the optional vertical scroll mode in OS X) (Second rant of the day).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
